Tuesday 22 October 2013
Star Trek Research
Written by Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Damon Lindelof
Directed by J.J Abrams
Produced by J.J Abrams, Bryan Burk and the Writers (as above)
Studios Bad Robot Productions, K/O Paper Productions and Skydance Productions
Distributor Paramount Studios.
Cast included star such as
Chris Pine Kirk
Zachary Quinto Spock
Karl Urban Bones
Simon Pegg Scotty
Benedict Cumberbatch Khan
Peter Weller Marcus
Released 16th May 2013
Genre Action/Sci-Fi/Fantasy
Budget estimated $190,000,000
Box office estimated $467,365,246
Rating PG13
Filming locations consisted of Iceland and Los Angeles, California
(7000 East Avenue, Livermore, California USA)
(Paramount Studios, 5555 Melrose Avenue, Hollywood, Los Angeles, California)
Critical Rating 7.9/10
Saturday 19 October 2013
Avengers Research
Writers
- (Screenplay) Joss Whedon
- (Story) Zak Penn
Director
- Joss Whedon
Producer
Kevin Feige
Stars
- Robert Downey Jr
- Chris Evans
- Scarlett Johansson
- Mark Ruffalo
- Chris Hemsworth
Genre
- Action/Fantasy
Certificate
12A
Studios
- Marvel Studios
- Walt Disney Studios (distributed)
Budget
$220,000,000
Year Of Release
2012
Release Date
4th May 2012
Gross Profit
$623,357,910
Critical Reception
92% approval
8/10 (298 reviews)
Dredd Essay
Why did Dredd flop at the Box
Office?
The action thriller film Dredd
was released in 2012. The producers for this film were Alex Garland, Andrew
MacDonald and Allon Reich. The studios involved in it were DNA Films and IM
Global and the distributors were Lionsgate and Entertainment Film. The main
stars in Dredd were Karl Urban, playing Judge Dredd, Lena Headey playing Ma-Ma
and Olivia Thirlby who played Anderson.
The marketing strategies used to promote the film were teaser trailers,
an interactive website and posters. The estimated box office figure was
$36,000,000 which was less than the original budget resulting in the film
‘flopping.’
In my opinion one of the reasons
why Dredd failed to succeed as expected at the box office is because the film
did not comply with, in Mark Kermode’s opinion, the four ways to enable success
which are: to have a newsworthy budget, to include spectacular visuals, to not
be a comedy and to include ‘A’ list stars. Although Dredd was not a comedy and
contained superb visuals the other two aspects were not met. The estimated budget for Dredd was a rather
unimpressive $45,000,000 as opposed to its rival film The Avengers who had a
huge budget of over $200,000,000. Other films released within the same space of
time are films such as ‘The Dark Knight Rises’, ‘Skyfall’ and ‘The Amazing
Spiderman’ which were all box office successes. A ‘newsworthy budget’ is
anything above $100,000,000, which Dredd was not. The main reason for the
budget being so small is because there were no A list stars involved in the
film.
The Avengers included ‘A’ list
stars such as Robert Downey Jr who is well known for his roles in Sherlock
Holmes and the Iron Man sequels. Downey has been nominated for several awards
including two Oscars, and has won three Golden Globe awards, one being for ‘Best
Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture - Comedy or Musical’ in the 2009
film Sherlock Holmes’. Downey is a well know and very well respected ‘A’ list
star and has been nominated for an estimated 58 awards. On the other hand Karl Urban, the lead in Dredd, is not so well
known and has only been nominated for an estimated 12 awards, the majority of which are cast related such
as the BSFC award for ‘Best Assembled Cast’ for the cast of the well known film
Star Trek. Urban is not classed as ‘A-list’ and has had no main roles in any well
known or popular films.
The certificate given for Dredd
was 18 which is justified by the amount of violent and gore ridden scenes
included in the film. I believe that due to the high certificate rating the
opportunity to create tie-ins such as figurines and animated games was limited as
the audience would be grown adults, not children or teens. In comparison The
Avengers certificate was a 12A, aimed at a much younger audience there by providing
every opportunity to capitalise on merchandise such as games and figures,
boosting the status of the film and its profits. I also believe that the
certificate rating correlates with the marketing opportunities: as the film is an
18 the times at which it can be publicised are restricted to eliminate every
possibility of an under 18 year old seeing trailers that are considered to be
in appropriate for them. Owing to this, the trailers could only be show on the
television after a certain time in the evening, if at all.
This film was a remake of the
1995 film starring the A list star Sylvester Stallone. Through researching this
film I discovered that this also failed at the box office. Even though the film
starred an undoubtedly famous actor. The budget for this film was higher than
the 2012 remake, at an estimated $70,000,000, and made a mere total profit of
just over $7,000,000. The first thing that came to mind after reading about
this film was why the producers decided to make a remake of a film that performed
so badly at the box office. As this film starred Stallone, a top ranking A List
star, I can only imagine how high expectations must have been, which makes the
failure even more surprising to me.
The film was originally going to
be released in 3D alone but due to the poor reception, was then granted 2D
viewing. In my opinion the fact that this film was only released in 3D to begin
with was another reason why it didn’t reach the targeted profit. With it only
released in 3D this limits where the film can be seen as not all cinemas worldwide
are equipped with the appropriate technology.
The film was based on the comic
book series Judge Dredd which isn’t
as famous and well known as those included in The Avengers. The Avengers
consists of well known comic book characters, which all have their own separate
films, coming together as a team. The film includes characters such as Iron
Man, The Incredible Hulk, Captain American and Hawkeye, all of which are
unquestionably renowned. I think that the main reason for the success of The
Avengers is because all characters included all have a well known background
and all feature. Not only does The Avengers comply with Mark Kermode’s ‘list of
four’ of using a newsworthy budget, A list stars, Visual effects and is not a
comedy, but the film has such a detailed background that almost everyone is
familiar with it. The critical rating for The Avengers was an impressive 92% or
8/10. Dredd also had good reviews with a 7/10 but due to the fact that the
original story is not as renowned worldwide as the famous Marvel characters I
believe that it had a huge part to play within the failure of the film.
In conclusion, Dredd flopped due
to the producers not following the four rules set by Mark Kermode: having A
list stars, a newsworthy budget, superb effects and to not be a comedy. With
the original film failing surely the producers would consider what they could
do differently to avoid a similar outcome.
Friday 18 October 2013
Four Quadrant Pictures
A Four Quadrant Picture is a marketing term used to describe a film targeted to all audience quadrants: men over 25, men under 25, women over 25, women under 25.
Usage
In the movie business, and it is most definitely a business, everyone is looking to maximize the audience for their picture. A four-quadrant picture is that magical type of film that attracts parents and kids, men and women, and brings in huge amounts of revenue on opening weekend. In the term “four-quadrant,” the quadrants refer to gender (male and female) and age (under 25 and over 25).
For most studios, the goal is to get enough details to line up so that they have broad-based, family-friendly appeal in designing a blockbuster or four-quadrant film. An important aspect of getting that appeal is the ratings system. An 18 Rating can be the kiss of death for a studio trying to market a film featuring pre-teen characters. A lowering from PG-13 to PG can mean millions more in revenue as parents feel more comfortable bringing young children to a given film like Evan Almighty.
Examples
One of the most famous four-quadrant, blockbuster films is Star Wars and all of its sequels. Jaws is another landmark blockbuster film. Other more current examples include Night at the Museum, Journey to the Center of the Earth, Shrek (1-3), Spiderman (1-3), Pirates of the Caribbean (1-3), andWall-E.
Implications
Another interesting by-product of the rise of four-quadrant films in the industry is cross marketing. Those films often are associated with toys and other products that both advertise the film and bring in revenue on their own. In addition, four-quadrant films are powerful vehicles for product placement advertisers looking to show their wares to the largest audience possible.
On the down side, many wonder how much effort is placed on credible, engaging story lines as opposed to marketing opportunities in these behemoth cinematic endeavors.
Usage
In the movie business, and it is most definitely a business, everyone is looking to maximize the audience for their picture. A four-quadrant picture is that magical type of film that attracts parents and kids, men and women, and brings in huge amounts of revenue on opening weekend. In the term “four-quadrant,” the quadrants refer to gender (male and female) and age (under 25 and over 25).
For most studios, the goal is to get enough details to line up so that they have broad-based, family-friendly appeal in designing a blockbuster or four-quadrant film. An important aspect of getting that appeal is the ratings system. An 18 Rating can be the kiss of death for a studio trying to market a film featuring pre-teen characters. A lowering from PG-13 to PG can mean millions more in revenue as parents feel more comfortable bringing young children to a given film like Evan Almighty.
Examples
One of the most famous four-quadrant, blockbuster films is Star Wars and all of its sequels. Jaws is another landmark blockbuster film. Other more current examples include Night at the Museum, Journey to the Center of the Earth, Shrek (1-3), Spiderman (1-3), Pirates of the Caribbean (1-3), andWall-E.
Implications
Another interesting by-product of the rise of four-quadrant films in the industry is cross marketing. Those films often are associated with toys and other products that both advertise the film and bring in revenue on their own. In addition, four-quadrant films are powerful vehicles for product placement advertisers looking to show their wares to the largest audience possible.
On the down side, many wonder how much effort is placed on credible, engaging story lines as opposed to marketing opportunities in these behemoth cinematic endeavors.
"The Big Six"
A major film studio is a film producer and production company that releases a substantial number of films annually.
The Big Six film studios are:
1. Warner Bros. Pictures. Comprising a whopping 19.7 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures), Warner Bros. Pictures is the biggest player in the film industry. Securing the rights to major films like Harry Potter, Superman, Batman, The Matrix and Star Wars have made Warner Bros. the No. 1 name in the business.
2. Paramount Pictures. With 15.5 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures), Paramount Pictures continues to be one of the most successful film production companies in the world. Star Trek, War of the Worlds, the Mission Impossible series, Transformers and Tropic Thunder are just a few of the popular films produced by Paramount Pictures.
3. Walt Disney. One of the most renowned film production companies in the history of the business, Walt Disney now holds 15.3 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures). With highly successful movies like Pirates of the Caribbean, National Treasure, Meet the Robinsons and Enchanted, there's no doubt that Disney will continue to play a key role in the industry for years to come.
4. Columbia Pictures. Comprising 12.9 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures), Columbia Pictures remains a big player in the business. Some of this company's recent successes include Casino Royale, The Da Vinci Code, the Spider-Man series and Step Brothers.
5. Universal Studios. 12.2 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures) belongs to Universal Studios, which continues to make millions for the film industry. With major hits like the Bourne series (Bourne Identity, Bourne Supremacy and Bourne Ultimatum), The American Pie series, Knocked Up, American Gangster and The Incredible Hulk, it's very clear that Universal Studios knows what it takes to make money in this industry.
6. 20th Century Fox. Also known as "Twentieth Century Fox," this highly successful movie production company makes up 11.9 percent of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures). Some of the biggest and most successful movies from this empire include the X-Men series, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, Star Wars Episodes II and III, and the Fantastic Four.
Seven Key Areas of Audience and Intitutions
- The issues raised by media ownership in contemporary media practice; (how does who owns a media company influence the type of film made and its potential success? For example do BIG companies make BIG films and therefore make all the money? Is it possible for small companies to succeed?)
- The importance of cross media convergence and synergy in production, distribution and marketing; (how do companies work together to produce, distribute and publicize a film? How can Disney use their size to promote and publicise a film? How can small companies work together to promote their business' when making and promoting a film?)
- The technologies that have been introduced in recent years at the levels of production, distribution, marketing and exchange; (how has the introduction of digital film, 3D, DVD, Blue Ray, internet streaming, downloadable content, home cinema influenced the types of films made, the way we watch them and the way we 'buy' them?)
- The significance of proliferation in hardware and content for institutions and audiences; (how and why have film companies had to alter the way they work now everyone has web enabled phones, PC's, consoles etc? How have audiences changed their viewing habits now we no longer need to go to the cinema to watch a film)
- The importance of technological convergence for institutions and audiences; (can you think of examples of how different technologies have come together to help the film industry?)
- The issues raised in the targeting of national and local audiences (specifically, British) by international or global institutions; (how do film companies try and attract their audience? Do they do different things in different countries?)
- The ways in which the candidates’ own experiences of media consumption illustrate wider patterns and trends of audience behaviour. (what is your opinion on the above? Do you see the developments as a good or bad thing?)
Thursday 17 October 2013
Dredd Research
Producer:
The producers for Dredd were Alex Garland, Andrew MacDonald and Allon Reich. Alex Garland is a novelist and screenwriter and had also wrote the screenplay for Danny Boyle's '28 Days Later'. Andrew MacDonald is a Scottish film producer and is best known for his collaborations with director Danny Boyle and screenwriter John Hodge in the films '28 Days Later', 'Trainspotting' and 'Shallow Grave'. The green light for this film was in 2008.
Distributor:
It was distributed by Entertainment Film, Lionsgate.
Script Writer:
The writer for this film was Alex Garland, an English novelist, film producer and screenwriter. He published his first novel, 'The Beach' in 1996 which was then later created into a film by Danny Boyle staring Leonardo DiCaprio.
Budget:
The estimated budget was $45,000,000
Box office gross:
The box office gross was $36,000,000
Director & Cast
The director for this film production was Pete Travis who has directed films such as 'Vanage Point', 'Endgame' and 'Omaghe'
The cast included stars such as
Karl Urban who played Dredd who is famous for his roles in 'Star Trek Into Darkness' and 'The Bourne Supremacy.'
Olivia Thirlby, Anderson, is well known for roles in 'Juno' and 'No Stings Attached'
Lena Headey who plays 'Ma-Ma' who has stared in films such as 'The Purge' and '300'
Jason Cope, Zwirner who is known for his role in 'Doomsday' and 'District 9.'
Marketing:
The film had a website ( http://www.dreddreport.com/ ) which was good for marketing as it was interactive but could have possibly been hard to find for those wanting to look at it. There were teaser trailers but due to the 18 certificate given they were not widely shown but were mainly found on 'youtube' and the website (above) The last strategy used were still and motion posters to give the last push for promotion.
Critical Reception:
Fueled by bombastic violence and impressive special effects rooted in self satire and deadpan humor Dredd 3D is a rare example of a remake that actually works.
Dredd was awarded 78% or 7/10 according to review website 'Rotten Tomatoes.'
Reasons for lack of success:
Although the advertising won an award for best thriller TV spot the advertisement wasn't enough. Due to the fact Dredd was highly rated, 18, the trailer could not be shown within a certain time without risk of the younger audience seeing it. This in it's self restricted the viewing audience as people under 18 could not view it. I believe that television advertisement would have been perfect to use if the certificate was appropriate to do so.
Screening options was another issue as Dredd was first originally only shot in 3D and not all cinemas are equipped with such screening necessities narrowing down the viewing opportunities.
As the film is based on the comic book 'Judge Dredd' only those familiar with the comic would understand the background to the story. Also as the film included various gore and violence scenes only those who enjoy watching such films would go and see it which again limits the audience available.
Awards:
Won:
Golden Trailer Award for Best thriller TV spot
Nominated:
- Most original TV spot
- Best action TV spot
- Best graphics in a TV spot
- Best music TV spot
- Best action poster
- Most original poster
Technology used:
The film was shot digitally and primarily in 3D using SI2K, RED MX and Phantom Flex high-speed cameras and multiple camera rigs were used. Also, some 2D elements were converted to 3D in post-production.
Tie-Ins:
Dredd was released on DVD,Blue-Ray and Digital download on 14th January 2013 in the UK. No toys from this film were made because of the high certification rating (18) meaning that its not suitable for a younger audience. A tie in comic book was published on the 5th September 2012 by the Judge Dredd Magazine editor Matt Smith and drawn by 2000AD artist Henry Flint. The comics plot contains a prequel to the films narrative and follows Ma-Ma's life as a prostitute.
Tuesday 1 October 2013
Dredd Film Review
I really enjoyed watching Dredd. It had an
easy story line to follow and was full of action meaning that the film grabbed
my attention straight away. Dredd is an original film based on the comic book
character Judge Dredd. I wasn't entirely
sure on what the film was about when it first started and beforehand as I had
never heard of the film or character Dredd. I was pleasantly surprised as the
film developed, I found the action and violence positively thrilling to watch and
I thought all scenes were well directed and all fight scenes were choreographed
perfectly. I wouldn’t recommend this film, to those that are squeamish at the
sight of blood but for people that love the thrilling adrenaline packed
action/sci-fi films, Dredd is perfect. As the film was an action/thriller it
included very graphic scenes of blood and violence, if the film was without
such scenes I believe that it would be nowhere near as gripping and exciting as
I found it. Slow motion shots were used to bring a more elegant and artistic
feel to the film which contrasted the gore ridden scenes, which again I feel
that if these scenes weren’t included the film would lose the interest of its viewers
very quickly. We were informed before the film that Dredd actually lost money
at the box office which I was very surprised by as I thoroughly enjoyed the
film and thought the balance between the gory scenes and scenes of less intense
fighting were just right. One thing I was confused by was when the second group
of judges entered the locked down block as it wasn't made clear why they were
there and who had called them, I also found a minority of “mind reading” scenes
unnecessary and somewhat disturbing. That in itself was very confusing. The initial
idea of reading someone’s mind is not exactly challenging but I feel as if it
was over complicated as there were several layers to these scenes which weren’t
thoroughly explained, resulting in the confusion. One thing that did really
interest me about this film is that the villain “mama” was a women, not something
you see very often in films like this, I believe that this added to the excitement
of the film and her background story we are given makes her appear much more menacing
and evil then we initially think. She has a very violent character which is
something we wouldn’t expect to see in a film like this which again, makes the
film that little more exhilarating. All in all I believe that this is a very
well produced film which unfortunately didn't sell as expected but for me as a viewer I thoroughly enjoyed the gripping and tense story line and will most defiantly
be recommending it to others and watching it again myself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)